Superman III

The franchise took a dive with this installment. It has some of the worst special effects I've seen, even for the 80's. Not only that, but it's incredibly cheesy. It's too bad, because Richard Pryor and Christopher Reeves were very good, but the script and plot interfered with the ability to enjoy the movie. This film did nothing to help them out. It pains me to say this, but stay away and save your time for the first two movie or the 2013 reboot.

Many are still scratching their heads at this incredibly quirky sequel. Where's Lex Luthor or any other known Superman nemesis? Why is The Man From U.N.C.L.E. playing a Gordon Gecko meets a game show host turned villain bent on killing Superman? Why does this super rich bad guy with unlimited resources choose Richard Pryor as his weapon? Why the holy hell is Richard Pryor in this movie?

I didn't see the movie; BUT, I have to point it out : WHO watches a movie TWICE ; when they knew after the first time that it SUCKED. Ya know Hollywood can always make a better movie tomorrow; but tomorrow you'll wake up and still be STUPID ; cuz STUPID is FOREVER